|
2009 Top 5 VoIP Comparisons* | | | | | | | | Basic Monthly Costs | $14.99 | $14.99 | $9.95 | $9.95 | $14.99 | | Plan Minutes & Fees | Outgoing Minutes | 500 | Unlimited | 500 | 200 | 400 | Extra Rate/Min | 0.02 | N/A | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.39 | International Calls | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | | Service Features | 3-Way Calling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Caller-ID | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Voicemail | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Speed Dial | Yes | | | Yes | Yes | Call Waiting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Call Forwarding | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Calling No (*69) | Yes | Yes | Yes | | | Do Not Disturb | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Repeat Dialing | Yes | | | | | Call Transfer | | | Yes | | | Call Blocking | Yes | | Yes | Yes | | Area Code Selection | Yes | Yes | | Yes | | Address Book | | | Yes | | | Add Lines | | | Yes | Yes | | Software Phone | | | Yes | Yes | | Directory Assistance | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $ | Phone Support | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Email Support | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Yes | Money Back Guarantee | | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $ Extra Charges Apply |
|
|
The movie Extra Terrestrial (ET) coined the phrase “phone home” and each year American’s look for more cost effective ways to do just that. The past 10 years have seen the development and growing popularity of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies to achieve cost savings over the traditional circuit-switched telephone networks. The two dominate technologies used for VoIP are: (1) the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and (2) Peer-2-Peer (P2P). For business and educational institutions SIP VoIP solutions have produced substantial savings. For home voice users, however, SIP VoIP is still value challenged. A typical circuit-switched landline phone costs about $19.95 per month (plus tax). The good old American landline phone should be graphically depicted beside the word “reliable” in the dictionary. Not only does it keep working, even when all electrical power fails, but it can even provide you with a light to dial with. At $15 dollars per month SIP VoIP is still value challenged due to the lack of full support for E9-1-1 emergency services and of course the reliability issues inherent with using a real time application over a “best effort” network like today's Internet. Although few VoIP articles still reference Internet Request For Comments (RFC) 3714 “IAB Concerns Regarding Congestion Control,” the technical challenges associated with VoIP are widely known. Further, even with the recent dubious edict by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that VoIP service providers will provision support for E9-1-1 within 90 days, this still leaves the reliability issues unresolved. The use of adaptive rate CODEC’s to prevent congestion collapse is a swell idea if it applies to my neighbor’s service but not my own. Using adaptive rate CODEC’s to elicit voluntary user preemption has no appeal in the modern world. Technology is supposed to be getting better and it is clearly not better that users receive disconnects or degraded service quality in order to constrain network bandwidth consumption. Quality of Service (QoS) has been the four letter word of the Internet for a very long time. Yet, we know that real time applications such as video and voice are a mismatch for “best effort” service models. Cost savings are important, but not if they require users to accept backward technology leaps. After 9/11 the United States should have begun standardization efforts to insure that VoIP QoS levels would be equivalent to circuit-switched networks, especially where emergency E9-1-1 calls are concerned. The recent FCC order only requires that E9-1-1 call center traffic be properly routed. It does nothing to insure QoS of the connection once the call is completed. As for VoIP in the home, there is too little incentive for savvy consumers to part with more of their hard earned communications dollars for an industry offering that simply does not meet the needs of the user. Until something concrete can be done to move SIP VoIP forward, service based on P2P such as Skype seems to be the only sensible choice on the kitchen table. Why should home users pay $15 or more per month for less reliable communications than they already have with their land line? Skype gives users the ability to experience “best effort” voice over the Internet for FREE. Could this be the reason why more than 125 million copies of Skype’s P2P software has been downloaded? And for the occasions where interconnection with the existing circuit-switched telephone networks is required, Skype offers a very competitive 2 cents per minute interconnection rate. With Skype you can talk for 12 ½ hours interconnected to the phone system for the same cost as a basic rate SIP VoIP service. Until genuine changes are made to SIP VoIP QoS there does not appear to be a convincing or compelling reason today for users to choose anything other than P2P VoIP services such as Skype to render Internet “best effort” home phone services. You can try Skype for FREE by clicking here. Jason Canon has authored numerous technical research papers including: photonic switching, gigabit networking, VoIP E9-1-1 and others. He is an expert author for EzineArticles.com. E-mail: Jason Canon at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
. |
|
|
Growing small to medium size (SMS) business firms have long faced the dilemma of how to best grow their telephone and fax services at affordable prices. The transition of going from simple key telephone systems to ownership and operation of a Private Branch eXchange (PBX) phone system involves a large capital outlay, monthly operational and maintenance costs, and the acceptance of risks associated with technical obsolesence. Traditional telephone companies addressed this need by offering Centrex service. Centrex provides a hosted telecommunicatons solution where customers rely on their local central office switch to provide PBX-like services but without the capital investment necessary to purchase a switch. Today, hosted telecommunications is rapidly becoming a synonym for a variety of hosted VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) service offerings. In this article, we examine call quality issues you should consider when deciding if a hosted telecommunications service is the right choice for your business. The telephone system that people used in the 1990's didn't start out with Alexander Graham Bell using a Class 5 Electronic Switching System (5ESS). High-quality telephone calls were achieved over a long period of time. Just about the time when telephone calls were reaching a state of perfection, along came cell-phones and call quality kinda moved back to square 1. With cell phones long distance costs dropped but so did lots of telephone calls. The new consumer paradigm became lower costs and lower quality communications. This nicely set the stage for the development in Israel of Voice over the Internet. The Internet was designed from the ground up to meet the technical requirements of computer-to-computer communications. The protocol mechanisms support cool things like allowing data to arrive over the network out of chronological order because computers don't really mind rearranging data after transit. Humans, however, tend to become a bit flustered if the end of a sentence repeatedly arrives before the beginning. Nevertheless, because it is less expensive to build a network with TCP/IP routers than with 5ESS systems the lure of reducing phone costs resulted in lots of effort to create VoIP. VoIP, and other real-time applications, require low-latency queuing, jitter control, and other mechanisms to control the Quality of Service (QoS) allocated by network resources. One drawback to deploying QoS, however, is that it increases operational complexity and costs. QoS on the Internet is also at the center of a hotly contested debate known as Internet Neutrality or "net neutrality". The capability to prioritize traffic flows on the Internet has broad revenue and equal access implications for data applications such as the world wide web. Without QoS support, however, the quality of any given VoIP connection over the Internet is little more than a coin toss. In many areas of the world ISP's have overprovisioned network capacity obviating the need for QoS. In cases where a transit network is not adequately overprovisioned, however, call quality can suffer substantially. Thus, it has become common to hear stories about consumers who have fantastic VoIP hosted telecommunications service from a given provider while a different set of customers of the same service experience terrible call quality to the extent that they discontinue service. VoIP hosted telecommunications providers have no control over call quality on public Internet transit networks. Business consumers especially need to weigh call quality issues verses cost when evaluating VoIP hosted telecommunications services. The best way to actually determine if a given VoIP hosted telecommunications service will satisfy your business needs is to try it out. But before you try out any service make sure they offer a 30-day money back satisfaction guarantee. The guarantee can prevent you from getting stuck with charges should your chosen provider not turn out to deliver the call quality your business needs. After surveying the marketplace for VoIP hosted telecommunications services and considering factors such as the underlying network provisioning we recommend that you give Packet8 Virtual Office a try. Packet8 currently has one of the largest subscriber bases in the industry. Packet8 has a strategic arrangement with Level 3 communications for use of its 23 thousand mile fiber optic backbone. If anyone has an adequately overprovisioned network backbone for VoIP it is Level 3. You can also rest assured with the 30-day money back guarantee Packet8 offers for its Virtual Office service. To find out more about Virtual Office click here. |
|
|
Planning for VoIP is easier if you develop a VoIP requirements list. Some of the more obvious needs your VoIP requirements list should take into consideration includes the end-user features and services that are needed. Additionally, your requirements list will be a better planning tool if you include the network requirements necessary to support VoIP. Finally, your VoIP requirements list should address all of the administrative overhead necessary to deploy, operate, and replace VoIP systems. VoIP systems are known for the rich set of user features they provide. A VoIP requirements list will provide you with the opportunity to verify that the capabilities needed by your users are included in the system you choose. This is not an area to take for granted because some of the better known services don't include capabilities that you may require. For example, while most systems provide the Caller ID number many don't provide the equally useful Caller ID name. Will your calls still be forwarded if the power fails? Will the system automatically block telemarketer tone? Are 800 numbers supported and is auto redial available? A VoIP requirements list helps to insure that you validate your requirements before making a selection. Voice makes different demands of networks than data. Computers don't mind if data arrives out of sequence but humans expect their voice conversations to be linear. To satisfy voice network requirements for jitter, latency, packet loss, and quality of service may require not only bandwidth upgrades to IP networks but also a minimum of router reconfigurations. Your VoIP requirements lists should also include security planning. Will your voice calls need encryption? To administer your VoIP systems and networks management software will be required. Remember you will need to constantly monitor the aforementioned network performance parameters to insure that the network continuously supports the level of quality you need. In order to have the administrative and technical management systems in place prior to deploying VoIP you will want to include this important area of consideration in your planning and VoIP requirements list preparation phase. |
|
|